| ............ | Current Research
Current
Nutrient / Sediment Research: 1992-93 Activities
Research Methods
A monitoring site at the outlet of South Tobacco Creek near Miami provides a gross basin estimate of non-point sources to the Red River downstream. Samples are collected at this site on a flow-event basis for the purpose of determining nutrient and sediment loads.
The Twin Watersheds are adjacent catchments sharing a common divide and consisting of a West (4.24 ha. or 10.48 ac.) and an East (5.64 ha. or 13.94 ac.) drainage area. The basins have only slight differences in topography and other physical attributes.
1992-93
Results Twin Watersheds:
Spring snowmelt runoff samples were collected
in 1992 and 1993 and charted below.
The portion of dissolved nitrogen levels were significantly higher in 1993 than in 1992; some samples exceeded 15 mg/L, and this may have been due to the application of Anhydrous ammonium fertilizer in the Twin Watersheds during the fall of 1992 (Figure 2). Total phosphorus concentrations in the
1992 and 1993 spring runoff samples were similar. Like nitrogen in
1993, a high proportion of phosphorus was in the dissolved form (Figure
3).
Nutrient analysis of data collected during a snow collection experiment during the winter of 1994 indicated that airborne matter arriving via precipitation supply an insignificant amount of nutrients as a proportion of total spring runoff loading. It is apparent that natural soil-water interactions regulate nutrient levels in the Twin Watersheds. Snow sampling and analysis at the Twin
Watersheds confirmed that water quality is primarily affected by soil-water
interactions, not airborne matter carried via precipitation.
A rainstorm on July 24, 1993 provided the only significant rainfall in the Twin Watersheds during this research period. Because automatic sampling apparatus failed, manual collections were conducted. Table 1 provides a summary of those findings:
Total phosphorus values were roughly one half of nitrogen levels (.50 and .57 mg/L respectively), with 70% of those levels being in dissolved form. During the July 24 rainstorm, the Twin Watersheds displayed similar aqueous chemical characteristics, and it is hoped that both the West and East sides will continue to demonstrate similar chemical output, establishing an acceptable control scenario for future research. Spring
Runoff
Two nitrogen samples were collected during 1992, with four samples during 1993 (Figure 4). Most Nitrogen was in particulate form during the initial year, with dissolved N being dominant in 1993.
Summer
Storms - Three Rain Events
For all but one Miami station runoff sample, nutrients were largely associated with suspended matter (particulate). This contrasts significantly with the observations at the Twin Watersheds (discussed in previous section), where sediment concentrations were relatively low and nitrogen and phosphorus were mostly in the dissolved phase. These findings may be an indication that the sediment load observed at Miami is partly the result of stream bank erosion occurring in the South Tobacco Creek during high flow events. However, additional monitoring will be required to confirm this hypothesis. For the May event, both nitrogen and phosphorus exhibited a "flow-dilution" relationship where nutrient concentrations decreased over time). The June 8-9 event did not display a flow concentration relationship for N, largely due to a suspiciously high third sample (a possible sampling error). However, phosphorus did display a noticeable trend - with peak concentration coinciding with peak flow - indicating a flow-drive relationship. Additional data will be required to confirm this observation. Concentrations of N and P in June runoff water were higher on average than for other events monitored during 1993. Total nitrogen, present largely in particulate
form, generally followed a flow-drive relationship during the July rain
event, with N concentrations changing in direct proportion to stream flow.
Dissolve nitrogen remained constant. A flow-drive relationship was
also evident for Phosphorus.
Previous Page 5 of 6 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||